How important was individuality to the composers of the Clas essays

How important was individuality to the composers of the Clas essays In order to assess how important individuality was to composers of the Classical period the question of what exactly individuality is must first be tackled. It can be defined as the aggregate of qualities and characteristics that distinguish one person or thing from others and in a musical context I believe this would refer most specifically to style and overall effect. It is perhaps easiest to detect individuality by simply listening to a piece of music, (although conductors and performers interpretations must be acknowledged), and it is then possible to analyse the music in detail in order to locate the specific devices, harmonies and textures which give it this unique sound and effect. During the Baroque period a great deal of music was composed explicitly for a particular means or setting such as the church. It is therefore not entirely surprising that the word individuality has come to be associated less with this period and more with that of the Classical and composers such a s Haydn, Beethoven and Mozart. The Classical period and the emergence of the galant style, brought with them a much greater interest in public displays of music than had previously been prevalent. It is therefore likely that this was one reason behind composers striving for a more individual style. Less complicated (more homophonic) textures than in the Baroque period also allowed more scope for composers of the time to experiment with style and so take a more individual approach. There was more focus on melody, sharp contrasts, contrasting phrasing within movements, and antecedent and consequent phrases. The use of one mood to unify a whole movement was abandoned and many new musical forms were introduced. Of these one of the most prominent was the string quartet. The string quartet (A composition for four solo string instruments, usually two violins, viola and cello ) was born out of the divertimento &ndas...

Free Essays on Algerias Colonialism

Before discussing the experience of colonization of French in Algeria, it is necessary to give a definition of the term â€Å"Colonialism† as used in the following context. According to the Dictionary of Social Sciences, the term represents â€Å"the system of political and economic administration whereby a dominant country controls and exploits the resources of dominated peoples, who are often of a different culture.† Likewise, in the Dictionary of Critical Social Sciences, a colony is defined as â€Å"a poor or weak country that is occupied by the military and/or police forces of a more powerful country.† It seems that French control of Algeria definitely meets the dictionary definition of colonialism. Back in early African history, Europeans colonized and infiltrated African civilizations in order to make a profit and to be known as a superior nation. By doing this, European colonists changed and transformed the traditional African lifestyle. African’s were willing to let the colonists join them, but the Europeans went too far when they took over governments and tried to rule over the Africans. This colonization led to many problems in Africa that still affect modern day Africa. According to the European Colonization map, it shows that France and Great Britain ruled most of the Northern Part of Africa. There were two ways to rule colonies; direct rule (French) and indirect rule (Great Britain). The difference between these two different types of governing was that indirect rule was when a local chief or leader ruled the colony, but was used as just a messenger from a higher power of authority, in this case, the British. The British would make the laws for the ruler to enforce, and he would do it. In the case of direct rule, the country that colonized the country, ruled it. The French ruled their colonies in Africa and enforced their own rules, rather than let a local leader do it. And a good example of this is Algeria. In ... Free Essays on Algeria's Colonialism Free Essays on Algeria's Colonialism Before discussing the experience of colonization of French in Algeria, it is necessary to give a definition of the term â€Å"Colonialism† as used in the following context. According to the Dictionary of Social Sciences, the term represents â€Å"the system of political and economic administration whereby a dominant country controls and exploits the resources of dominated peoples, who are often of a different culture.† Likewise, in the Dictionary of Critical Social Sciences, a colony is defined as â€Å"a poor or weak country that is occupied by the military and/or police forces of a more powerful country.† It seems that French control of Algeria definitely meets the dictionary definition of colonialism. Back in early African history, Europeans colonized and infiltrated African civilizations in order to make a profit and to be known as a superior nation. By doing this, European colonists changed and transformed the traditional African lifestyle. African’s were willing to let the colonists join them, but the Europeans went too far when they took over governments and tried to rule over the Africans. This colonization led to many problems in Africa that still affect modern day Africa. According to the European Colonization map, it shows that France and Great Britain ruled most of the Northern Part of Africa. There were two ways to rule colonies; direct rule (French) and indirect rule (Great Britain). The difference between these two different types of governing was that indirect rule was when a local chief or leader ruled the colony, but was used as just a messenger from a higher power of authority, in this case, the British. The British would make the laws for the ruler to enforce, and he would do it. In the case of direct rule, the country that colonized the country, ruled it. The French ruled their colonies in Africa and enforced their own rules, rather than let a local leader do it. And a good example of this is Algeria. In ...

Carefully explain what economists mean by efficiency. Using examples Essay - 1

Carefully explain what economists mean by efficiency. Using examples from the real world where appropriate, explain why economists consider Monopolies to be i - Essay Example Efficiency can never be complete, and it always needs to be measured in relation to certain criteria. For economic efficiency the basic criterion is value, so that changes that tend to increase value are deemed efficient and changes that decrease it are thought to be inefficient. However, a state of affairs that can be qualified as economically efficient need not necessarily remain efficient when viewed from the point of view of other criteria. So, value is not only a relative quality but a subjective one as well because something has value only if there are those who want it. In this situation a question arises as to how can one be sure that value is maximised? One of the traditional answers of economists to this questions is contained in what is known as Pareto optimality, named so after Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto who postulated that if a change can leave somebody better off than before, and at the same time will not make situation of others worse, then the initial situation was not the one of the highest possible value because an improvement could yet be introduced (Wikipedia, 2006). And when the highest possible value is obtained, then any change that may improve one`s condition must inevitably be harmful for somebody else. This situation was defined by Pareto as allocative efficiency. Economists are concerned about economic efficiency for two reasons. The positive reason of their interest stems from the fact that people are seeking value, and this search can take place in any social circumstances so that on condition that enough money can be obtained people are ready to go for immoral, risky, and criminal occupations. From the theoretical point of view we can attribute this quest for value to the mentioned striving to maximise utility and profit, and when situations emerge that an unexploited value exists which is possible but not yet captured economists usually need to provide an account of why no ways are found to utilise this value. Thus,